Documentos similares a Termodinamica – Cengel 6 Ed. Termodinamica Cengel. Cargado por. Julio Oliva. Mecanica_De_Materiales_-_Beer_3ed_2. Mecanica de Fluidos Fundamentos y Aplicaciones – Yunus Cengel. Share? CENGEL, Yunus A. Transferencia de calor y masa. Tercera Edición. Pdf Descargar Mills Transferencia De Calor A F Mills Transferencia Solucionario de transferencia de calor YUNUS A CENGEL 2da Edicion.

Author: | Fer Mezim |

Country: | Somalia |

Language: | English (Spanish) |

Genre: | Spiritual |

Published (Last): | 23 December 2008 |

Pages: | 170 |

PDF File Size: | 5.44 Mb |

ePub File Size: | 10.65 Mb |

ISBN: | 837-2-39758-725-7 |

Downloads: | 60877 |

Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |

Uploader: | Sashakar |

The flow in the boundary layer is laminar in this range, but the flow in the separated region past the cylinder or sphere is highly turbulent with a wide turbulent wake.

Enviado por Fernanda flag Denunciar. At this point, the drag is mostly about 95 percent due to pressure drag. The curves exhibit differ- ent behaviors in different tranxferencia of Reynolds numbers: In the range of Reynolds numbers where the flow changes from laminar to turbulent, even the drag force FD decreases as the velocity and thus Reynolds number in- creases.

Assumptions 1 The outer surface of the pipe is smooth so that Figure 7—17 can be used to determine the drag coefficient. This results in a sudden decrease in drag of a flying body descsrgar insta- bilities in flight.

Both effects are significant at intermediate Reynolds numbers. Transferencix a result, the boundary layer detaches transferendia the surface, forming a separation region behind the cylinder. Therefore, the drag coefficient in this case is reduced by a fac- tor of 5 by simply roughening the surface. Determine the drag force ex- erted on the pipe by the river.

Flow in the wake region is characterized by random vortex formation and pressures much lower than the stagnation point pressure. The drag force is proportional to dfscargar square of the velocity, and the increase in velocity at higher Reynolds numbers usually more than offsets the decrease in the drag coefficient.

There is no flow separation in this regime.

For blunt bodies such as a circular cylinder or sphere, however, an increase in the surface roughness may actually decrease the drag coefficient, as shown in Figure 7—19 for a sphere. At higher velocities, the fluid still hugs the cylinder on the frontal side, but it is desczrgar fast to remain attached to the surface as it approaches the top of the cylinder.

The high pressure in the vicinity of the stagnation point and the low pressure on the opposite side in the wake produce a transferncia force on the body in the direction of flow.

Effect of Surface Roughness We mentioned earlier that surface roughness, in general, increases the drag coefficient in turbulent flow.

## Mecanica de Fluidos Fundamentos y Aplicaciones – Yunus Cengel

A decrease in the drag coefficient does not necessarily indicate a decrease in drag. A similar argument can be given for a tennis ball. This is especially the case for streamlined bodies. For a given hit, this means a longer distance for descatgar ball.

The delay of separation in turbulent flow is caused by the rapid fluctuations of the fluid in the transverse direction, which enables the turbulent boundary transferenca to travel further along the surface before separation occurs, resulting in a narrower wake and a smaller pressure drag.

Thus, the fluid follows the curvature of the cylinder.

### Solucionario transferencia de calor yunus cengel 3ed | Yordan VAZQUEZ –

For a table tennis ball, however, the distances are very short, and the balls never reach the speeds in the turbulent range. Obviously, roughening the sphere in yunsu case will increase the drag by a factor of 4 Fig.

The occurrence of turbulent flow at this Reynolds number reduces the drag coefficient of a golf ball by half, as shown in Figure 7— Once the drag coefficient is available, the drag force acting on a body in trahsferencia flow can be determined from Eq. This results in a much smaller drag coefficient and thus drag force for a rough- surfaced cylinder or sphere in a certain range of Reynolds number compared to a smooth one of identical size at the same velocity.

It should be kept in mind that the free-stream turbulence and disturbances by other bodies in flow such as flow over tube bundles may affect the drag coefficients significantly. The discussion above shows that roughening the surface can be used yunjs great advantage in reducing drag, but it can also backfire on us if we are not careful—specifically, if we do not operate in the right range of Reynolds num- ber.

Therefore, the surfaces of table tennis balls are made smooth. The average drag coefficients CD for cross flow over a smooth single circu- lar cylinder and a sphere are given in Figure 7— Experienced golfers also give the ball a spin during the hit, which helps the rough ball develop a lift and thus travel higher and further. This is done by tripping the flow into turbulence at a lower Reynolds number, and thus causing the fluid to close in behind the body, narrowing the wake and reducing pressure drag considerably.

The nature of the flow across a cylinder or sphere strongly affects the total drag coefficient CD. Both the friction drag and the pressure drag can be sig- nificant. This is in contrast to streamlined bodies, which experience an increase in the drag coefficient mostly due to friction drag when the boundary layer becomes turbulent. This large reduction in CD is due to the flow in the boundary layer becoming turbulent, which moves the separation point further on the rear of the body, reducing the size of the wake and thus the magnitude of the pressure drag.

This behavior is characteristic of blunt bodies. The drag force that acts on the pipe is to be determined.